Comparing Reforms of Juvenile Justice in Bangladesh and Malaysia
The article attempts to critically compare juvenile justice reforms in both jurisdictions of Bangladesh and Malaysia. It explores legal reforms in line with the international standards to ensure the effective juvenile justice system as well as child well-being in the respective legal systems. The juvenile justice practice of Bangladesh and Malaysia are a testament that diverse juvenile laws, norms and systems exist. After ratification of UNCRC, significant progress has been achieved in both countries. Malaysia adopted mechanisms for rehabilitation in terms of job-based education and alternatives measures by the Child Act 2001. Child-oriented justice and alternative measures have started with the commencement of Children Act 2013 in Bangladesh. For both countries, there is a need for establishing a child-friendly justice system, which would ensure sustainable juvenile justice.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the Substantive Justice International Journal of Law agree with the following conditions:
- The author owns the copyright and gives the journal rights to the first publication with the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work with the authorship of the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- The author owns the copyright and other ownership rights related to the article, such as patents, the right to use the substance of the article in their own future work, including lectures and books, the right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate articles, contractual arrangements additional to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of the initial publication in this journal
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger quotations of published works.