Regional Cooperation in The Utilization of Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines: An International Law Perspective
Abstract
The Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines was a project of interconnected cross-border pipelines connecting ASEAN countries in a bilateral manner based on the cooperation stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding of Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines. This paper will identify Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines with the two (two) cooperation models already practised worldwide, namely the interconnected model and the unified project model. The method used in this article was normative juridical, including the comparative approach and statute approach, by obtaining data from secondary sources. More specifically, this article would elaborate on which cooperation model could be adopted by Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines that would effectively govern the project. The results showed that the cooperation of Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines was unlike that practised by countries generally since the project consisted of both cross-border pipelines and regasification terminals. The decision to incorporate regasification terminals into the project was made to provide an alternative to the region's depleting gas supply. The model was not known in the cross-border pipeline regime and therefore could not be identified with the already known two (two) models. Although Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines were a series of interconnected pipelines in nature, the implementation was not in accordance with the theory. A cross-border pipeline and terminal regasification should not be put together in the same energy transport project as they both have different characteristics, thus making the governance of the project complicated while a harmonized legal framework plays an essential aspect in cross-border infrastructure. Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipelines will only focus on cross-border pipelines and will follow the model of a cooperative project.
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the Substantive Justice International Journal of Law agree with the following conditions:
- The author owns the copyright and gives the journal rights to the first publication with the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work with the authorship of the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- The author owns the copyright and other ownership rights related to the article, such as patents, the right to use the substance of the article in their own future work, including lectures and books, the right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate articles, contractual arrangements additional to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of the initial publication in this journal
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger quotations of published works.