SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW (SJIJL) is a journal published by the Faculty of Law at Universitas Muslim Indonesia, published here and explained about the ethics of publication of all parties involved in the process of making articles in this journal, including the authors, chief editors, editorial boards, reviewers and publisher.
► Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
Publication of articles in the journal Substantial Justice is an important building in the development of a network of knowledge that is coherent and understanding. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of authors and institutions that support them. The articles reviewed to support and realize the scientific method of obtaining the law. Therefore, it is important to agree on the expected ethical standards for all parties involved in the agreement: authors, journal editors, reviewer, publishers and the public.
The Faculty of Law-UMI as an SJIJL journal publisher takes the task of keeping all articles about very seriously, and we understand ethics and responsibility. We promise to advertise, reprint or commercial print, our journal editorial. In addition, the Faculty of Law - UMI and editorial board will assist in communication with other journals and/or publishers, which is useful and needed.
The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. All authors submitting their works to the journal for publication as original articles attest that the submitted works represent their authors’ contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
► Decision of Publication
The SJIJL Editor is responsible for deciding which entry articles should be issued. The validation of this work and its importance for research and discussion must always drive the decision. Editors can be guided by the journal policy editorial board and are limited by applicable legal provisions, such as defamation, infringement of copyright and plagiarism. The editor can negotiate with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
► Justice Aspects
Editors at all times translate texts for objective author intellectual content, regardless of race, sexual orientation, speaking section, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, or political views of the authors.
The editor and each editorial staff must disclose any information about the manuscript sent to anyone other than the author, reviewer, prospective reviewer, other appropriate editorial board, and publisher, as appropriate.
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play. The editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality. The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author
Contributing to making editorial decisions, reviewers always collect and assist editors in making editorial decisions, and can assist writers in improving the quality of manuscripts through editors.
Each selected reviewer does not need the requirements/interests to study the manuscript or does not need enough time to study must immediately receive an editor and withdraw from the review process.
Every manuscript received in the review must be approved as a confidential document. Manuscripts may not be distributed or discussed with others issued by the editor.
► Objectivity Standards
Reviews must be made objectively. Personal criticism from the author does not deserve to be conveyed. Reviewers must approve their opinions with supporting arguments.
► Source Recognition
Reviewers must release relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. A statement that observations, derivations, or pre-agreed arguments must be agreed with the relevant ones. The reviewer must also announce to the editor if there is substantial or overlap between the approved text and any other published article.
► Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Information or ideas obtained in the review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers must reject texts where they must oppose the interests of competition, collaboration, or other relationships and connections with one of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the manuscript.
► Reporting Standards
The author of the original research report must report an accurate report of the work carried out as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The underlying data must be included accurately in the manuscript. A manuscript must contain enough detail and references to allow others to request work. Aid reports or inaccurate information deliberately made as an unethical and unacceptable study.
► Data Access and Retention
The author is asked to provide raw data related to the manuscript for editorial, and must be prepared to provide public access to the data, if possible, and must, in any case, keep the data after publication.
► Originality and Plagiarism
Writers must ensure that they have written a fully original work, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others, then this has been quoted properly.
► Multiple, Redundant and Simultaneous Publications
An author may not publish manuscripts that describe the essence of the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Sending the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behaviour.
► Source Recognition
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors must cite publications that have been influential in determining the work reported.
► List of Manuscript Writers
Authors must be limited to only those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research reported. All people who have made significant contributions must be registered as co-authors. People or other parties who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The author of the correspondence must ensure that all appropriate authors are listed in the manuscript and there are no inappropriate authors and that all authors have seen and agreed to the final version of the paper and have agreed to submit for publication.
► Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors must disclose in their text any conflict of interest whether substantive or financial that might be interpreted to affect the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Material that is not approved in the proposed text may not be used in the research of editors who without the consent of the author, we are approved to continue working and the rights of others.
► Fundamental Mistakes in Published Works
When the writer discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the published work, the author should take the initiative to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or refine the manuscript.