The Influence of Positivism and Empirism in The Enforcement of Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia

Authors

  • Jamrud Qomaruz Zaman Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Achmad Khudori Sholeh Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fadil Fadil Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nor Salam Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Aina Sofea Binti Ros Azman University of Malaya, Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v7i1.267

Keywords:

Positivism, Empiricism, Realism, Inheritance

Abstract

Positivism and empiricism are modern paradigms become the basic guidelines for the schools of legal philosophy, namely legal positivism and legal realism. However, the current condition in Indonesia is dominated by the paradigm of legal positivism so that everything must be by written law. The practice of inheritance division that is always based on the concept of 2:1 as in the Compilation of Islamic Law is felt to be incompatible with community justice. The purpose of this research is to enrich the study of the positivism and empiricism paradigms as a renewal of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia. The benefit of this research is to inform that the integration of positivism and empiricism in law will produce competent law enforcement. This research is a normative research with a conceptual approach and data sources in the form of literature and data analysis techniques, namely evaluation. The results of this research are; (1) The factor that causes judges in Indonesia to use the judicial restraint approach excessively as a characteristic of legal positivism is the legal culture of the application of the civil law legal system. (2) The solution to the problem offered is to borrow Fazlur Rahman's double movement theory, namely historical contextualisation by taking universal values from the norm. Therefore, it is time for judges to be free to move to realize moral justice within the limits set by the Constitution and the Law on Judicial Power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyani, H., Putra, H. M., Muharir, Rahman, E. T., & Mustofa. (2022). Gender Justice in the Sharing of Inheritance and Implementation in Indonesia. Asy-Syari’ah, 24(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v24i2.14640
Amalia, E., & Az-Zafi, A. (2020). Penyetaraan Gender dalam Hal Pembagian Warisan. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2020.8.2.213-232
Amin, R. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia (A. Nabila (ed.); 1st ed.). CV Budi Utama.
Anggraeni, I. S., Muhyi, M., Ketut, I., & Suratno. (2023). Hakikat ilmu dan Pengetahuan dalam Kajian Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(1), 396–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8310477
Assiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, A. (2012). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. Penerbit Konstitusi Press.
Aulia, N., & Irham, M. I. (2022). Tafsir Feminisme: Telaah terhadap Ayat-Ayat Mawaris. Martabat: Jurnal Perempuan Dan Anak, 6(2), 295–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21274/martabat.2022.6.2.295-325
Aviva, F. N. (2023). Pengaruh Teori Positivisme Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. JRP: Jurnal Relasi Publik, 1(4), 111–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v1i4.1837
Azizah, F. N. (2021). Pembaharuan dalam Sistem Pembagian Waris Secara Proporsional. Journal of Legal Research, 3(4), 511–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v3i4.20935
Barus, Z. (2013). Analisis Filosofis tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.2.212
Boediningsih, W., & Wijaya, E. (2021). Penerapan Pembatasan Yudisial (Judicial Restraint)Bagi Pelaku LGBT (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016). Jurnal Al-’Adl, 4(2), 246–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58578/adl.v2i2.1100
Cahyani, A. I. (2016). Pembaharuan Hukum dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Al-Daulah, 5(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.30984/as.v7i1.57
Chalibi, M. (2019). Hukum Tiga Tahap Auguste Comte dan Kontribusinya terhadap Kajian Sosiologi Dakwah. Nalar: Jurnal Peradaban Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/njppi.v3i1.1191
Datumula, S., & M.S., S. (2022). Makna Keadilan Pada Ketentuan 2:1 (Dua Banding Satu) dalam Konsep Waris Islam. Al-Mashadir, 4(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31970/almashadir.v4i2.115
Dozn, W., & Rohimi. (2019). Logika Penemuan Ilmiah Teori (positivisme Logis)Auguste Comte. Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 7(2), 190–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2019.7.2.190-211
Endratno, C. (2022). Refleksi Filsafat Hukum: Telaah Sintesa Keadilan. Yustitiabelen, 8(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v8i2.555
Erwin, M. (2011). Filsafat Hukum: Refleksi Kritis terhadap Hukum dan Hukum Indonesia (dalam Dimensi Ide dan Aplikasi). Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fauziyah, I. M., & Yunitasari. (2022). Penerapan Waris 1:1 dalam Yurisprudensi Islam Perspektif Kesetaraan Gender. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 9(2), 1444–1456. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jips.v9i4.2022.1444-1456
Ferdiansyah, E., Winata, G., Nurhasanah, M. A., & Triansyah, A. (2023). Pengaruh Pemikiran filsafat Aliran Positivisme terhadap Pembaharuan Sistem hukum di Indonesia. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1100
Ferdiansyah, E., Winata, G., Nurhasanah, M. A., Triansyah, A., & Marwah, M. R. (2023). Pengaruh Pemikiran Filsafat Aliran Positivisme terhadap Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx
Ghoffar, A. (2022). Dinamika 50 Mahkamah Konstitusi di Dunia. Rajawali Pers.
Hayat, R. S. (2021). Konsep Dasar Critical Legal Studies: Kritik Atas Formalisme Hukum. Hermeneutika, 5(2), 235–241. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v5i2.5691
Herlambang, P. H. (2019). Positivisme dan Implikasinya terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum. Indonesian State Law Review, 2(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v2i1.36187
Hermanto, A. B. (2016). Ajaran Positivisme Hukum di Indonesia: Kritik dan Alternatif Solusinya. Selisik, 2(4), 108–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v2i2.650
Huijbers, T. (2016). Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Kanisius.
Hulwanullah, H. (2022). The Protection of Constitutional Rights Through The Practice of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Court. Ijerlas: International Journal of Education Review, Law, and Social Sciences, 2(6), 1047–1059. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v2i6.1239
Janah, N., & Nugroho, I. (2022). Fazlur Rahman’s Thoughts of Double Movement in the Cntext of the Development of Unity of Sciences. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 13(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.5718
Latipulhayat, A. (2018). Editorial: Mendudukan Kembali Judicial Aktivs dan Judicial Restraint dalam Kerangka Demokrasi. Padjadjaran: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 4(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a0
Mahmudi, Z. (2023). Menggali Hukum Waris Progresif.
Malik, F. (2021). Tinjauan terhadap Teori Positivisme Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 188–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.31488
Manullang, E. F. M. (2019). Legisme, Legalitas, dan Kepastian Hukum. Prenadamedia Group.
Mardani. (2023). Takharuj Adalah Pendekatan dalam Membagi Harta Warisan Secara Adil. Al-Ilmu: Jurnal Keagamaan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 8(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v6i2.529-541
Mayadah, U. (2020). Positivisme Auguste Comte. Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam Dan Filsafat, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/paradigma.v2i01.26576
Mochtar, Z. A., & Hiariej, E. O. . (2023). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas, dan Filsafat Hukum. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Munif, N. A. (2015). KHI dan Konfigurasi Politik Hukum Orde Baru (Vis a Vis Antara Hukum Islam dan Sistem Pemerintahan Otoriter. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 3(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2015.3.2.265-286
Muttaqin, L. (2013). Aplikasi Teori Double movement Fazlur Rahman terhadap Doktrin Kewarisan Islam Klasik. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 7(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v7i2.564
Muyasarah, H. (2021). Perempuan dalam Isue Poligami dan Kewarisan. Al-Munqidz: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 9(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52802/al-munqidz.v9i2:%20Mei.179
Nahdliyah, H., Sastradinata, D., Jatmiko, W., Tjahyani, J., & Yanto, M. (2011). A Comparative Study of Judicial Restraint and Activism on The Material Review of Presidential Threshold in The Constitutional Court. Jurnal Independen, 1(1), 356–373.
Nugroho, I. (2016a). Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologi dan Nilai Etisnya terhadap Sains. Cakrawala, 11(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v11i2.192
Nugroho, I. (2016b). Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologis dan Nilai Etisnya terhadap Sains. Cakrawala, 11(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v11i2.192
Prabowo, G. (2017). Positivisme dan Struktualisme: Sebuah Perbandingan Epistemologi dalam Ilmu Sosial. JWS: Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo, 1(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2017.1.1.1936
Rahardjo, S. (2002). Sosiologi Hukum: Perkembangan, Metode, dan Pilihan Masalah. Genta Publishing.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. PT Kompas Media Nusantara.
Rahmanto, F. I. (2023). A Comparative Study of Judicial Restraint and Activism on The Material Review of Presidential Threshold in Constitutional Court. Jurnal Independen, 11(1), 356–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v11i1.213
Rahmatullah, I. (2021). Filsafat Realisme Hukum (Legal Realism): konsep dan Aktualisasinya dalam hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. ’Adalah: Buletin Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i5.21395
Rahmatullah, I. (2022). Filsafat Positivisme Hukum (legal Positivisme). ’Adalah: Buletin Hukum Dan Keadilan, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v6i1.26427
Rato, D. (2021). Realisme Hukum: Peradilan Adat dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Kajian Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i2.24998
Rohmat, A. K. A., Bagus, M., Partiah, S., Kholinnur, M. H., & Fauzi, M. (2022). Positivisme dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 3(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v3i3.135
Rohmat, A. K. A., Bagus, M., Partiah, S., Kholiqunnut, M. H. R., & Fauzi, M. (2022). Positivisme Hukum dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 3(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v3i3.135
Samekto, F. A. (2012). Menggugat Relasi Filsafat Positivisme dengan Ajaran Hukum Doktrinal. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.1.108
Sampford, C. (1989). The Disorder of Law: A Critique of Legal Theory. Basil Blackwell.
Satriawan, I., & Lailam, T. (2019). Open Legal Policy dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstutusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(3), 559–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636
Sitabuana, T. H., & Adhari, A. (2020). Positivisme dan Implikasinya terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Mahkamah konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016). Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1715
Sulkifli, & Amir, N. H. (2023). Kontribusi Metode Double Movement Fazlur Rahman terhadap Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Tafsere, 11(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/jt.v11i1.37050
Sundaro, H. (2022). Positivise dan Post Positivisme Refleksi Atas Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Perencanaan Kota dalam Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu dan Metodologi Penelitian. Modul, 22(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.22.1.2022.21-30
Surawandi, & Maulidi, A. R. (2022). Filsafat Positivisme dan Ilmu Pengetahuan serta Perannya terhadap Pendidikan di Indonesia. Yaqzhan, 8(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/https://badge.dimensions.ai/details/doi/10.24235/jy.v8i1.9771?domain=https://www.jurnal.syekhnurjati.ac.id
Susanto, A. F. (2019). Filsafat dan Teori Hukum: Dinamika Tafsir Pemikiran Hukum di Indonesia. Prenadamedia Group.
Syafithri, F. N., Rahman, F. A., Piansah, A., & Firmansyah, D. (2023). Empirisme dan Fenomenologis dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Naturalism. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1100
Syahputra, A. (2023). Fiqh Education in Pesantren as a Model for Fiqh Education in the World. Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Social, 4(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35878/santri.v4i2.872
Takdir, M., Munir, F., Ludhfi, A., Muliyanzah, & Muttaqin, Z. (2023). The Takharruj Method as an Islamic Legal Solution for Customary Inheritance Practices among Muslim Communities in Pakamban Laok, Sumenep, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Law, 4(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v4i1.1044
Triono, A. (2020). Hegemoni Positivisme terhadap Pendidikan di Indonesia. Analytica Islamica, 22(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/jy.v8i1.9771
Umair, M., & Said, H. A. (2023). Fazlur Rahman dan Teori double Movement: Definisi dan Aplikasi. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 2(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v2i1.26
Vera, S., & Hambali, R. Y. (2021). Aliran Rasionalisme dan Empirisme dalam kerangka Ilmu Pengetahuan. Journal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(2), 59–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jpiu.12207
Wardani, W. I. (2023). Paradigma Ilmu Hukum dalam Dunia Sains. Jurnal Dharma Agung, 31(3), 284–293. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v31i3.3261
Wau, C. M., Hutajulu, M. J., & Dwiyatmi, S. H. (2020). Implikasi Positivisme Hukum terkait Pengaturan Teknologi Finansial di Indonesia. Alethea: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 77–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol3.no2.p77-98
We’u, G., Mbabho, F., & Ansel, M. F. (2023). Implikasi Teori Empirisme dalam Pelaksanaan Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata, 4(1), 471–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51494/jpdf.v4i1.848
Wicaksono, D. A. (2021). Mencari Jejak Konsep Judicial restraint dalam Praktik Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 51(1), 176–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.3014
Wiguna, M. O. C. (2023). Implikasi Filsafat Positivisme terhadap Ilmu Hukum dan Penegakannya. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 794–805. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.374
Yafie, M. J., & Zahro, A. (2023). Nalar Hukum Pembagian Harta Waris dengan Bagian Sama Rata di Desa Lanji Kabupaten Kendal. Jurnal Justitia, 6(2), 542–555. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v6i2.542-555
Zahro, F., & K.M., S. P. (2023). Kesetaraan Gender dalam Hukum Kewarisan Islam Perspektif M. Syahrur. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 7(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.201
Zuhdi, S. (2021). Transcendental Justice Law: The Relation of Law and Justice. Jpurnal of Transedental Law, 3(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v3i1.15196

Downloads

Published

2024-06-24

How to Cite

Zaman, J. Q., Sholeh, A. K., Fadil, F., Salam, N., & Binti Ros Azman, A. S. (2024). The Influence of Positivism and Empirism in The Enforcement of Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 7(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v7i1.267

Citation Check